You Are Here: Home » World News » AsiaPacific » A China view of Scarborough Shoal or Huangyan Island dispute in South China Sea

A China view of Scarborough Shoal or Huangyan Island dispute in South China Sea

The controversy over a tiny island in the South China Sea has intensified, making it the most serious standoff between China and the Philippines in the sea in recent years.

In early April, the Philippines sent a warship to harass 12 Chinese fishing vessels which sailed into the waters of Huangyan Island to shelter from bad weather.

Scarborough Shoal

Navy personnel and Philippine MPs at the tiny rock of Scarborough Shoal bearing Philippine flag in South China Sea in 1997. Picture: AFP AFP

According to media reports, the Philippines has also notified China on its readiness to raise the issue of the sovereignty of Huangyan Island to international arbitration. In addition, it tried to rename the island and remove the signs and monuments related to China.

WHO IS THE TROUBLEMAKER

Huangyan Island, a group of reefs and islets about 550 sea miles away from the Hainan Island in south China, has long provided a perfect shelter for fishing ships from nearby islands and the mainland of China.

“For many generations we have fished in this water,” said Ke Weixiu, a fisherman and native from the port of Tanmen in Hainan.

However, since the 1990s, Chinese fishermen have repeatedly been harassed by Philippine warships.

According to the fishery department under the Ministry of Agriculture, four Chinese fishing boats were intercepted by the Philippine navy in the waters around the island from January to March in 1998 and 51 fishermen on board were detained for about six months.

In May 1999, a Chinese fishing boat was rammed by a Philippine warship and sunk, according to the ministry.

From 2000 to 2011, at least 32 fishing ships, with 439 fishermen on board, were chased, robbed or detained by the Philippine navy.

The latest event occurred in April. Xu Detan, captain of one of the 12 fishing ships harassed, has not recovered from the shocking encounter with the Philippine navy even three weeks after returning home.

“A Philippine warship blocked our entry to the lagoon where we docked our ships,” Xu recalled. “We had no choice but to wait inside as they were armed.”

On April 10, nine Philippine soldiers, on a inflatable, boarded Xu’s ship with seven of them carrying rifles.

“They turned off the radio and satellite positioning system on my ship, searched the whole ship and took pictures while the 16 members of the crew, including me, were standing on the deck under the hot sun for four hours.”

Two Chinese Marine Surveillance ships conducting routine patrols in the area later came to the fishermen’s rescue and helped Xu and his colleagues return home safely.

“Usually a fishing trip will take 50 days but this time we were forced to cut it short to 25 days,” he said.

PHILIPPINES’ TERRITORIAL CLAIM IS UNTENABLE

Until 1997, the Philippines never disputed China’s jurisdiction and development of the island. But recently the Philippines has played tricks and triggered disturbances, as well as claiming the island as theirs.

The Philippines says it is the nearest country to Huangyan Island, so it claims the island belongs to it on this premise.

“This theory based on geographic distance for territorial sovereignty has absolutely no basis in international law and judicial practice,” according to Zhang Haiwen, deputy director of China Institute for Marine Affairs under State Oceanic Administration.

China Philippines disputed territory

A Chinese map showing the extent of China's territorial waters

“There is no such principle in international law that determines territorial ownership by geographic distance,” Zhang said, noting that many countries around the world have territories which are far away from their mainland and much closer to other countries.

“For example, the British Channel Islands are less than 12 nautical miles off the French coastline at their closest proximity. Some French territorial islands stretch across the Atlantic, lie close to the Canadian coastline in north America and even in the Pacific. But none of these islands have territorial disputes due to geographic distance,” said Zhang.

Philippines protest

A protester burns the Chinese flag during a protest over disputed Scarborough Shoal

“The world map would be totally redrawn if the Philippines’ theory was upheld,” Zhang said.

The Philippines claims that Huangyan Island is in the country’s 200-nautical miles-wide Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) and says its claim is in line with the United Nations Convention on the Law Of the Sea (UNCLOS).

Liu Feng, a researcher with National Institute for South China Sea Studies, said that the UNCLOS has neither the articles to change a country’s land territory, nor does it have the authority to allow a country to take another country’s territory by the right of the EEZ and the continental shelf.

The Philippines claims that the United States controlled Huangyan Island, thus it has inherited the island’s sovereignty and jurisdiction from the U.S. military.

“U.S. forces in the Philippines used Huangyan Island as a shooting range, but the U.S. has never claimed sovereignty over the island. How could the Philippines inherit it? It’s ridiculous,” said Zhang Haiwen.

“All the Philippine rhetoric is untenable in terms of international law,” said Liu Feng. “So the Philippines wants to take the initiative to stir things up by sending warships to harass Chinese fishermen in Huangyan Island waters and escalate tensions.”
Source: Xinhua

eCashOpinions.com

Comments (5)

  • mark

    if its ridiculous enough and the claim has no basis… then why China government so hesitant to have the case for international arbitration? He who speaks without modesty will find it difficult to make his words good……A smart man is usually humble.

  • Anonymous

    Let us settle this in a peaceful and diplomatic ways for our children… Do not waste future of innocent people because of a very small island. This can be a foolish move which will be read in future world history books forever.

  • Cargosquid

    Notice what is not said except in the map.

    Forget this rock. China also claims the entirety of the Spratlys.

  • Kay Juan Yan Island

    “U.S. forces in the Philippines used Huangyan Island as a shooting range, but the U.S. has never claimed sovereignty over the island. How could the Philippines inherit it? It’s ridiculous,” said Zhang Haiwen. ANSWER: The Philippines, as the owner of the shoal (not inherit), allow the US forces (the tenant in Subic) to use it as their shooting range. China never protested. Why did they allow the US to use it if they think they owned it? because they know the Philippines really owned it.

  • Juan de la Cruz

    I cannot believe that a nation almost one thousand nautical miles away could overwhelm the right of the sovereign state of the republic of the Philippines. The shoal is well within the country’s 200-nautical-mile exclusive economic zone, as recognised by international law. Also, archaeological evidence shows that the islands, reefs and shoals at issue have been used by inhabitants of what is now the Philippines since prehistoric times. Chinese historical claims since ancient times amount to an absurdity as this would be like Italy claiming as its sovereign possession all areas previously occupied by the Roman Empire. The name China Sea was invented by European cartographers and should not lead anyone to think that the entire sea belongs to China. In the same vein, neither does the entire Indian Ocean belong to India. The United Nations Convention on the Laws of the Sea is the strongest legal basis for the definition of the territorial sea and exclusive economic zone of the Philippine archipelago. Let China show its real nature, if it does, of an expansionist government or society. The whole world is watching, and I don’t think they would want that image in the world.

© 2012 A1social.com

Scroll to top